Archive and Search
Login
« Half-Way Jam 2009 | Main | Read My New Geoff Tate Interview... »
Wednesday
Apr012009

It's Time for Grunge

It's time.

That's right. It's time.

It's time to bring back grunge.

Are you like me? Are you burned out with stadium rock? Music that objectifies women? Worthless party tunes?

Grunge is the music of my generation. Despite forming in 1987, Nirvana became the signature band of the 90s – creating the so-called grunge sound. Their formation in Seattle helped replace the Sunset Strip as the mecca of popular rock.

While some would argue Nirvana killed all other forms of rock – this isn’t entirely true. Nevermind was released in 1991. That year was pretty diverse for rock: people hadn’t taken sides yet. By 1994 it was all over but the shouting for bands like Poison and Britny Fox. At this point, Nirvana were kings of the grunge world and Alice in Chains and Soundgarden were filling stadiums – and the rock charts.

Surely this deserves some respect. After all, Nirvana and Alice in Chains changed the course of music history. Maybe the grungers had it right: the days had come and gone for the L.A. hair farmers.

Grunge was so big when I was in high school, we actually had “flannel day” during spirit week. I never saw Nirvana live, but I do know one person that was so obsessed with Seattle she called the city her “holy land.”

If you’ve missed grunge, here’s a link that has lots of tips to bring back the 90s music phenomenon.


 

Reader Comments (35)

good one !
April 1, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterDamnp78
I went to Candlebox in Tucson Monday night...GREAT show. Lots of energy and the music was great. Even with Kevin Martin, the lead singer, having some voice problems at his own admission, it was still great.
April 1, 2009 | Unregistered Commenterkryg1171
I've never considered Candlebox grunge. They are just a great rock 'n' roll band.
April 1, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterJT
Nirvana... The band that killed rock n roll.
April 1, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterKenny Crawford
Oh geez I was going WTF and then I remembered...LOL

Not nice to play trix on the old folk (like me)... :)
April 1, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterChessie
please don't do this to us, there is a reason it died lets not make it come alive again!
April 1, 2009 | Unregistered Commenterlooksthatkill
so much denial............
April 2, 2009 | Unregistered Commenterdon
I agree with Don.
I mean, come on, I love this shit as much as the next guy - maybe even moreso, (www.tyr-online.com), but grunge did have it's place in things. Ofcourse, you won't see a complete revival of that genre the same way we've seen a revival of 80's hair metal music... but it was a logical progression from where we were to where we are.
Having said that, I still personally don't like several of the bands that were labled grunge.
April 2, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterValentine
The Best thing that ever happened to music was when Cobain blew his head off, he's dead and so is Grunge. Stay Dead! Cobain was totally a no talent!
April 2, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterDVick
To show everyone how much I despise Nirvana and the entire grunge genre I have decided to release THE most controversial album cover in many many years. The band's name is Lynzee , the album is "Victim of Nirvana". I will get death threats and hate mail but I could care less , NOBODY liked grunge in 1992 and nobody likes it now. Screw em. Be on the look out 80s Metal fans , you are gonna laugh your ass off!!
April 2, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterRetrospect Records
WHEW...THAT WAS A CLOSE ONE...ALMOST DELETED YOU FROM MY FAV'S :)
April 2, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterCK
god this is pathetic. it's only music people yet you revel in someone commiting suicide? or make comments about nobody liking grunge in 1992? wow i guess all those people who bought "smells like teen spirit" secretly threw them away in 1992. and they really weren't there at the concerts or anything it was just a lighting trick. you know it's okay to like more than one kind of music, it won't kill you. look at allyson, she likes more than just glam, you can see it in her posts. i know not many people agree with me but if you can't be objective then you're only fooling yourself.

as for retrospect records, well you've just guaranteed i will never buy any of your cds. not for the release you're talking about. to each his own but your comments are completely off base.

flame away but i'm done posting here because it's getting very negative if you don't agree with the group in everything they say and there are too many people posting crap about being glad people are dead because they don't like their music or other ridiculous things like that. we all have opinions but some of them need to be kept to yourselves.

i know i've made some of the posters day by saying i'm done posting but i'll still read what allyson has to say because she does put out some good info, especially about rocklahoma. too each his own.
April 2, 2009 | Unregistered Commenterdon
one last thing, thanks valentine for being objective. i will check out your band and hold nothing against you.
April 2, 2009 | Unregistered Commenterdon
Reading through these comments makes me die a little on the inside. Now granted, I love glam as much as the next guy here (there's nothing quite like a hair band), but there was some great music that came out of the Seattle "grunge" (I hate that label) scene and anybody, even here can't deny that.

Now I don't mind Nirvana (overrated as hell, though), but I can't help but feel blinding rage when people lump all Seattle bands together with them. None of the so-called "grunge" bands had anything in common besides being from Seattle. Nirvana, Green River and Mudhoney were punk bands, Pearl Jam was 70's rock, Soundgarden was metal with a touch of psychedellic and art rock later on, Alice in Chains was metal with a bit of glam (second half of Facelift had some, anyway) and gothic post-punk (Dirt) thrown in, TAD was straight-up Sabbath, Melvins are Sludge Metal, Screaming Trees were neo-psychedelia, Malfunkshun was arena rock with some metal, Mother Love Bone was glam, and Love Battery... ummmm...(I don't have a clue what the hell they are, but they're awesome and have some of the best live performances I have seen. Still around, BTW). There is no grunge genre. It was just a case of a bunch of bands coming out of one place and the media needed a new thing to sell when the general public got tired of glam metal. Look what that label got us: a slew of watered-down, talentless copycat bands like Hinder, Creed, Nickelback, Bush, Breaking Benjamin, Puddle of Mud, Three Day's Grace, etc. (more or less the same thing happened to glam metal when the genre became a parody of itself when shit bands like Bon Jovi and Stryper appeared and got lumped in with good ones like Motley Crue and Def Leppard). On the positive side of the Seattle influence however, there's Soul Coughing.

But I digress. I'm probably wasting my breath here. People here will continue to spout the spout the same crap about "grunge". Being one of the few people who enjoys both glam and "grunge" (my iPod has Motley Crue, GNR, Van Halen, Kiss, and W.A.S.P., as well as Nirvana, Alice in Chains, TAD, Soundgarden, Malfunkshun and Love Battery), I'd take either over the shit we have now. And besides, we all know thrash metal is the best!
April 7, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterRon
glam is great, grunge is too, i think grunge kinda died when there was grunge fashion contest, and like you said flannel day, and when pearl jam came out uggggggh, !nirvana alice in chians soundgarden are all great
April 28, 2012 | Unregistered Commenterdevin

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.